~17 hrs
faster symptom relief in adults
in a Cochrane review
RR 0.79
hospitalization risk in outpatients,
not statistically significant,
2024 meta-analysis
2007
Japan warns against Tamiflu
for teenagers after reports of
abnormal behavior

Tamiflu (oseltamivir) is the most widely prescribed antiviral drug for influenza, and governments around the world stockpiled it in case of a pandemic. It has also been one of the most controversial drugs of the past two decades. Reports from Japan in the mid-2000s described teenagers who behaved abnormally, and in a few cases fell to their deaths, while taking the drug, prompting warnings. Separately, researchers who obtained the manufacturer’s full clinical study reports concluded that the drug’s benefits had been overstated, sparking debates about data transparency and whether stockpiling was justified.

Headlines called Tamiflu a dangerous scam. The evidence is more nuanced: oseltamivir modestly shortens flu symptoms, its effect on serious complications in otherwise healthy outpatients is uncertain, nausea and vomiting are common side effects, and links to psychiatric events remain debated because influenza itself can cause them. Antiviral treatment remains recommended for hospitalized and high-risk patients. This article explains what the research shows and how patients can make informed decisions.

Key takeaways

A 2014 Cochrane review based on full clinical study reports found oseltamivir shortened time to first symptom alleviation in adults by about 16.8 hours, with increased nausea and vomiting, and concluded the drugs had small, non-specific effects on symptoms.

A 2015 Lancet meta-analysis of nine trials with 4,328 adults found a 21 percent shorter time to symptom alleviation and fewer lower respiratory complications and hospital admissions among infected patients.

A 2024 JAMA Internal Medicine meta-analysis of 15 trials found oseltamivir was not associated with a significant reduction in hospitalization among outpatients but increased gastrointestinal side effects.

Japan warned against prescribing Tamiflu to teenagers in 2007 after reports of abnormal behavior; regulators added label precautions, while studies suggested influenza itself contributes to such events. Antivirals remain recommended for high-risk and hospitalized patients.

Does Tamiflu work, and is it safe? Tamiflu (oseltamivir) is an antiviral that modestly shortens flu symptoms, by about a day on average, if started early. Large reviews found its benefits are smaller than once claimed, and a data-transparency controversy surrounded its original trials. Reports of abnormal behavior, mainly from Japan, prompted warnings, though flu itself can cause such symptoms. It is most useful for people at high risk of complications.

What Is Tamiflu and How Does It Work?

Tamiflu (oseltamivir) is an antiviral drug that blocks an enzyme the influenza virus needs to spread between cells, which can shorten the illness if taken within a day or two of symptom onset. Oseltamivir belongs to a class of drugs called neuraminidase inhibitors, which block an enzyme influenza viruses use to release new virus particles from infected cells. By slowing the spread of virus within the body, the drug can reduce the duration and severity of illness, particularly when started within 48 hours of symptom onset. Oseltamivir is taken by mouth as capsules or liquid and is approved for treatment and prevention of influenza in adults and children. A related drug, zanamivir, is inhaled, and newer antivirals such as baloxavir work by a different mechanism. Antiviral drugs do not replace vaccination, which remains the primary means of preventing influenza.

Can Tamiflu Cause Abnormal Behavior?

Reports, mainly from Japan, of abnormal behavior such as delirium and self-harm, especially in young people, led to warnings; however, influenza itself can cause similar neurological symptoms, complicating the picture. Japan used far more Tamiflu than any other country in the early 2000s. CIDRAP reported in 2005 that an FDA pediatric safety review had identified neurologic and psychiatric events, including delirium, hallucinations, abnormal behavior, convulsions, and encephalitis, nearly all in Japanese children, along with 12 deaths; the FDA said the increased reports most likely reflected increased awareness of influenza-associated encephalopathy, greater access to the drug in Japan, and intensive monitoring, and an advisory committee found the deaths unrelated to the drug. NBC News reported that in March 2007, after two 14-year-olds fell to their deaths in separate incidents while taking the drug, Japan’s Health Ministry instructed the distributor to warn doctors not to give Tamiflu to teenagers, and that the FDA had added a precaution to the U.S. label in November 2006 about abnormal behavior. Both Roche and the FDA noted that severe influenza itself can trigger such behavior.

Later Japanese studies found that abnormal behavior also occurred in young people with influenza who had not taken oseltamivir, and Japan lifted its restriction on prescribing the drug to teenagers in 2018 while continuing to advise that children and teenagers with influenza be monitored for abnormal behavior regardless of treatment. The U.S. label continues to advise monitoring for neuropsychiatric events.

Does Influenza Itself Cause Abnormal Behavior?

A key question is whether abnormal behavior is caused by the drug or by influenza. A 2008 review in Drug Safety by Stephen Toovey and colleagues, authors affiliated with the manufacturer, examined 3,051 spontaneous reports of neuropsychiatric adverse events in 2,466 patients treated with oseltamivir from 1999 to 2007, about 90 percent originating from Japan. The review noted that such events in Japanese and Taiwanese children with influenza had occurred before oseltamivir was started and resembled events after treatment began, and concluded that available data did not suggest a higher incidence in treated than untreated influenza patients. A 2014 study in the Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy by Y. Nakamura and colleagues analyzed Japanese surveillance of abnormal behavior during influenza over seven seasons and found that the pattern of severe abnormal behavior followed influenza activity and occurred regardless of which neuraminidase inhibitor, or no drug, was used, concluding that patients with influenza should be observed for abnormal behavior whether or not they take oseltamivir.

Tamiflu Safety Concerns: Timeline 1999U.S. approval 2005FDA pediatric reviewof Japanese reports 2006–07U.S. label precaution;Japan teen warning 2014Cochrane review offull trial reports 2018Japan lifts teenrestriction 2024Hospitalizationmeta-analysis Sources: CIDRAP (2005); NBC News (2007); Jefferson et al. (2014); Hanula et al. (2024).

What Was the Tamiflu Data Controversy?

Researchers and the Cochrane group fought for years to access full clinical trial data from the manufacturer; when released, analyses concluded Tamiflu’s benefits were more modest than earlier claims suggested. Much of the controversy over Tamiflu concerned evidence rather than safety. Governments based stockpiling decisions partly on analyses suggesting oseltamivir reduced complications such as pneumonia and hospitalizations, but some of these analyses relied on unpublished trials. Researchers from the Cochrane Collaboration, with support from the BMJ, spent years seeking the full clinical study reports, detailed documents submitted to regulators, from the manufacturer. The resulting 2014 Cochrane review by Tom Jefferson and colleagues analyzed 107 clinical study reports and included 46 trials in formal analysis. For treatment of adults, oseltamivir reduced the time to first alleviation of symptoms by 16.8 hours, from about 7 days to 6.3 days; in otherwise healthy children the reduction was 29 hours, with no effect in children with asthma. The reviewers found no clear reduction in hospitalizations or confirmed serious complications in the trial data, an increase in nausea and vomiting, and a reduced risk of symptomatic influenza when used for prevention. They concluded the drugs have small, non-specific effects and that the trial evidence did not settle whether they reduce complications.

The episode became a landmark in the movement for clinical trial transparency, influencing policies requiring fuller disclosure of trial data to researchers and the public.

Other Meta-Analyses Reach Different Conclusions

A 2015 meta-analysis in The Lancet by Joanna Dobson and colleagues, using individual patient data from nine trials with 4,328 adults, focused on patients with confirmed influenza. Oseltamivir shortened median time to alleviation of all symptoms by about 25 hours (97.5 hours versus 122.7 hours), reduced lower respiratory tract complications requiring antibiotics more than 48 hours after randomization (4.9 percent versus 8.7 percent), and reduced hospital admissions for any cause (0.6 percent versus 1.7 percent), while increasing nausea and vomiting. The analysis was funded by the Multiparty Group for Advice on Science (MUGAS) foundation, and the trials it pooled had been sponsored by the manufacturer.

A 2024 meta-analysis in JAMA Internal Medicine by Ryan Hanula and colleagues examined 15 trials with 6,166 infected outpatients to assess whether oseltamivir prevents hospitalization. Oseltamivir was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in hospitalization overall (risk ratio 0.79, 95 percent confidence interval 0.48 to 1.29) or among older patients (risk ratio 1.01), but was associated with more gastrointestinal adverse events (risk ratio 1.43). The authors noted that most trial participants were relatively healthy outpatients and called for trials in high-risk populations.

What Three Major Analyses Found for Oseltamivir Cochrane, 2014Symptoms: ~17 hrsfaster in adultsHospitalization: noclear reductionMore nausea, vomiting Lancet, 2015Symptoms: 21% faster(~25 hrs)Hospital admissions:0.6% vs 1.7%More nausea, vomiting JAMA IM, 2024Outpatient hospitalization:RR 0.79 (not significant)Older adults:RR 1.01GI side effects RR 1.43 Sources: Jefferson et al. (2014); Dobson et al. (2015); Hanula et al. (2024).

Who Should Take Tamiflu?

Antivirals like Tamiflu are most beneficial for people at high risk of flu complications, such as older adults, young children, pregnant people, and those with chronic conditions, rather than for every healthy adult. Public health authorities such as the CDC recommend antiviral treatment as early as possible for people with suspected or confirmed influenza who are hospitalized, have severe or progressive illness, or are at higher risk of complications, even if more than 48 hours have passed for hospitalized patients. Higher-risk groups include children under 5 (especially under 2), adults 65 and older, pregnant people and those up to two weeks after delivery, residents of long-term care facilities, and people with chronic conditions such as asthma, heart disease, diabetes, kidney or liver disease, neurological conditions, or weakened immune systems. For otherwise healthy outpatients, antivirals may be considered if started early, though the expected benefit is modest. These recommendations rely partly on observational studies in hospitalized patients, which have suggested benefits that randomized trials in healthy outpatients could not confirm.

Situation Typical guidance
Hospitalized with influenza Antiviral treatment recommended as soon as possible
High-risk outpatient Treatment recommended, ideally within 48 hours of symptoms
Healthy adult with mild flu May be considered if started early; modest benefit
Household contact at high risk Preventive use may be considered
Child or teen on oseltamivir Monitor for unusual behavior, which can also occur with flu itself
General summary of public health guidance; individual decisions should involve a clinician.

Are There Newer Flu Antivirals Than Tamiflu?

Yes. Newer antivirals such as baloxavir (Xofluza) offer a single-dose option and a different mechanism, though they have their own cost and resistance considerations, and vaccination remains the first-line defense. Baloxavir marboxil (Xofluza), approved in the United States in 2018, works differently from oseltamivir by blocking a viral enzyme needed for replication, and is taken as a single dose. A 2020 randomized trial in The Lancet Infectious Diseases by Michael Ison and colleagues enrolled 2,184 high-risk adolescent and adult outpatients and found that single-dose baloxavir had superior efficacy to placebo and similar efficacy to oseltamivir in relieving influenza symptoms, with safety comparable to placebo. Some influenza strains can develop reduced susceptibility to baloxavir, and public health agencies monitor antiviral resistance. Inhaled zanamivir and intravenous peramivir are other options in specific situations.

Common Side Effects

The most common side effects of oseltamivir are nausea and vomiting, which can be reduced by taking the drug with food. Headache and other symptoms occur but are hard to distinguish from flu itself. Rare serious skin reactions have been reported. Neuropsychiatric events, such as confusion, delirium, hallucinations, and self-injury, have been reported, mostly in children and teenagers, though influenza can cause similar effects; caregivers are advised to watch for unusual behavior in young people with influenza regardless of treatment.

Prevention With Oseltamivir

Oseltamivir can also be used to prevent influenza, for example in household contacts of an infected person or during outbreaks in nursing homes. The Cochrane review found that preventive use reduced the risk of symptomatic influenza in individuals and households. Public health agencies recommend preventive antivirals mainly for people at high risk of complications who cannot be vaccinated or may not respond well to vaccination, and to control outbreaks in long-term care facilities. Preventive use is not a substitute for vaccination and is generally not recommended for healthy people.

Why Benefits Are Modest

Several factors explain why oseltamivir’s benefits in trials appear modest. Influenza often resolves on its own within a week in healthy people, leaving limited room for improvement. The drug works best when started within 48 hours of symptom onset, but many people seek care later. Many trial participants with flu-like illness did not have confirmed influenza, diluting measured effects. And serious complications are relatively rare in healthy outpatients, so trials have limited power to detect reductions. In hospitalized patients and high-risk groups, where complications are more common, observational studies have suggested larger benefits, although such studies can be biased.

Cost and Stockpiling Debates

Governments spent billions of dollars stockpiling oseltamivir for pandemic preparedness, particularly after bird flu concerns in the mid-2000s and the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. Critics of the stockpiling argued that decisions were based on incomplete data about complications, while supporters said antivirals could still play a role in reducing severe illness and buying time during pandemics before vaccines become available. The debate prompted calls for better evidence before large public purchases and for regulators to share full trial data.

Key Facts at a Glance

Oseltamivir shortened time to first symptom alleviation in adults by about 16.8 hours in a 2014 Cochrane review of full clinical study reports, which did not find clear reductions in hospitalization. A 2015 meta-analysis of infected adults found 21 percent faster symptom relief and fewer hospital admissions. A 2024 meta-analysis found no significant reduction in outpatient hospitalization and more gastrointestinal side effects. Japan warned against teenage use in 2007 after abnormal behavior reports and lifted the restriction in 2018; studies found similar behavior in influenza patients regardless of treatment. Antivirals remain recommended for hospitalized and high-risk patients.

Influenza Complications Worth Knowing

Influenza is more than a bad cold. It can lead to pneumonia, worsening of chronic conditions such as asthma and heart failure, inflammation of the heart or brain, and secondary bacterial infections. In children, influenza-associated encephalopathy, a rare but serious brain complication, can cause confusion, seizures, and abnormal behavior, which helps explain why neuropsychiatric events were observed in children with influenza regardless of treatment. Each year, influenza causes many hospitalizations and deaths, particularly among older adults, young children, and people with chronic illnesses. These risks are why vaccination and timely antiviral treatment for high-risk patients remain public health priorities despite debates over antiviral effectiveness in healthy outpatients.

Common Myths

“Tamiflu cures the flu.” It modestly shortens symptoms; the immune system clears the infection.

“Tamiflu causes suicides in teenagers.” Neuropsychiatric events have been reported, but studies found similar events in untreated influenza patients, and a causal link has not been established.

“Tamiflu is useless.” Evidence shows modest symptom benefits and supports use in high-risk and hospitalized patients.

“Antivirals replace vaccination.” Vaccination is the primary prevention tool; antivirals are a supplement.

Key Terms

Oseltamivir: The generic name for Tamiflu, a neuraminidase inhibitor antiviral.

Neuraminidase inhibitor: A drug that blocks a viral enzyme needed to release new virus particles.

Clinical study report: A detailed document describing a clinical trial’s methods and results, submitted to regulators.

Influenza-associated encephalopathy: A rare brain complication of influenza, more common in children.

Baloxavir: A newer single-dose influenza antiviral with a different mechanism.

The Bottom Line

Tamiflu is neither a miracle drug nor a deadly scam. In healthy outpatients, it shortens flu symptoms by roughly half a day to a day when started early, with nausea and vomiting as common side effects, and its effect on hospitalization is uncertain. Neuropsychiatric events reported mainly in Japanese children appear closely tied to influenza itself, though caregivers should watch young patients closely. The controversy over hidden trial data led to important reforms in transparency. For people at high risk of complications or hospitalized with influenza, antiviral treatment remains recommended, while vaccination is the most effective prevention for everyone.

Further Reading

The 2014 Cochrane review and accompanying BMJ coverage describe the data transparency effort and findings. The 2015 Lancet and 2024 JAMA Internal Medicine meta-analyses provide differing perspectives on complications and hospitalization. Public health agencies publish annual guidance on influenza antiviral use. Product labeling describes side effects and precautions, including monitoring for neuropsychiatric events.

Practical Advice for Patients

If you develop flu symptoms, especially fever, cough, and body aches with sudden onset, consider whether you are in a higher-risk group. If so, contact a clinician promptly, since antiviral treatment works best when started early. Healthy adults with mild illness may choose rest, fluids, and symptom relief, discussing antivirals with a clinician if symptoms are severe or worsening. If you or your child take oseltamivir, take it with food to reduce nausea and watch for unusual behavior, which should be reported to a clinician. Seek emergency care for difficulty breathing, chest pain, confusion, persistent high fever, or dehydration. Get vaccinated each year to lower your risk of infection and severe illness.

Lessons From the Controversy

The Tamiflu story offers lessons beyond influenza. Regulatory approval and widespread use do not guarantee that a drug’s benefits are as large as marketed, and access to complete trial data is essential for independent evaluation. Safety signals from spontaneous reports require careful study to distinguish drug effects from disease effects. And public communication should convey both benefits and uncertainties so patients and policymakers can make informed choices. These lessons have shaped how researchers and regulators approach other drugs and vaccines.

How Clinicians Decide

Clinicians weigh several factors when deciding whether to prescribe oseltamivir: how long symptoms have lasted, the severity of illness, the patient’s age and health conditions, pregnancy status, whether influenza is circulating locally, and test results when available. Rapid influenza tests and molecular tests can confirm infection, though treatment for high-risk patients is often started without waiting for results during flu season. Shared decision-making, in which clinicians explain expected benefits and side effects, allows healthy patients to choose based on their preferences, such as returning to work sooner versus avoiding nausea.

A Balanced View

Both critics and defenders of Tamiflu have valid points. Critics correctly highlighted that early claims about reducing complications were not supported by complete trial data, that benefits in healthy outpatients are modest, and that side effects are common. Defenders point to analyses suggesting reduced complications in confirmed influenza and to observational evidence of benefit in severely ill patients, where withholding treatment could be harmful. The most accurate summary is that oseltamivir offers modest benefits that may matter most for high-risk patients, with uncertainties that further research in those groups could resolve.

Antiviral Resistance

Influenza viruses can develop resistance to antivirals. In the 2007–2009 period, seasonal H1N1 viruses became widely resistant to oseltamivir before being replaced by the pandemic H1N1 strain, which was generally susceptible. Public health laboratories monitor circulating strains for resistance to oseltamivir, baloxavir, and other drugs, and guidance is updated if resistance emerges. Appropriate use of antivirals, targeting those most likely to benefit, helps limit resistance. Resistance surveillance is one reason why having multiple antiviral classes is valuable.

Currently circulating seasonal influenza viruses have generally remained susceptible to oseltamivir, though monitoring continues each season.

Influenza Vaccination: The Foundation

Annual influenza vaccination remains the primary tool for preventing influenza and its complications. Vaccine effectiveness varies by season and strain match, but vaccination reduces the risk of illness, doctor visits, hospitalization, and death, and can make illness milder in people who become infected. Vaccination is recommended for nearly everyone aged six months and older, with particular emphasis on high-risk groups. Antivirals complement vaccination by providing treatment when infection occurs, especially for people at higher risk of complications.

Combining vaccination, early treatment for high-risk patients, and basic hygiene measures offers the best overall protection during flu season.

Oseltamivir in Pregnancy and Children

Pregnant people are at higher risk of severe influenza, and observational studies have not shown increased birth defects with oseltamivir use, so antiviral treatment is recommended for pregnant people with suspected or confirmed influenza. For children, oseltamivir is approved from infancy for treatment, with doses based on weight, and it is recommended for young children and those with high-risk conditions. Parents should give the medication with food, complete the prescribed course, and watch for unusual behavior or worsening symptoms, contacting a clinician with concerns. In healthy older children with mild illness, families can discuss whether the modest benefit is worthwhile.

Symptom Relief Without Antivirals

For healthy people with mild influenza who choose not to take antivirals, supportive care helps: rest, fluids, and over-the-counter pain relievers and fever reducers such as acetaminophen or ibuprofen used according to label directions. Aspirin should be avoided in children and teenagers because of the risk of Reye’s syndrome. Honey can ease cough in people over one year old. Staying home until at least 24 hours after fever resolves without medication helps prevent spreading the virus. Monitoring for warning signs ensures timely care if complications develop.

Reporting Side Effects

Patients and caregivers can report suspected side effects of oseltamivir or any medication to the FDA’s MedWatch program, and clinicians are encouraged to report serious events. These reports help regulators detect safety signals, as occurred with neuropsychiatric events in Japan. Because spontaneous reports cannot by themselves establish causation, regulators combine them with clinical trial data and observational studies to assess risks and update labels when warranted.

Keeping a record of when symptoms began relative to starting medication helps clinicians and regulators evaluate possible connections.

Practical Takeaways

Get vaccinated every year. If you are at high risk and develop flu symptoms, contact a clinician quickly about antivirals. If you are healthy with mild illness, discuss whether the modest benefit is worth possible nausea. Take oseltamivir with food, complete the course, and watch children and teens for unusual behavior during influenza whether or not they take the drug. Seek urgent care for breathing difficulty or confusion. Evaluate dramatic claims about medications by looking at the full body of evidence rather than isolated reports.

Health care workers and caregivers of high-risk people should also discuss with clinicians whether preventive antivirals make sense during outbreaks, especially in settings such as nursing homes, where influenza can spread rapidly and cause severe illness among residents who may not respond strongly to vaccines.

Ultimately, decisions about antiviral treatment are best made in consultation with a clinician who knows the patient’s health history, considering the timing of symptoms, risk factors, and personal preferences about possible side effects and modest symptom benefits.

Being informed about both the benefits and limitations of oseltamivir allows patients to participate actively in these decisions, rather than relying on either exaggerated promises or alarming headlines about the drug.

Staying informed through reliable health sources each flu season helps patients make timely, confident decisions.

Clinicians can also explain local influenza activity, testing options, and which antiviral may be most appropriate for each individual patient this season.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Tamiflu work?

Tamiflu (oseltamivir) does work, but modestly. Large reviews, including analyses of previously withheld trial data, found it shortens flu symptoms by about a day on average when started within a day or two of onset. Earlier claims that it dramatically reduced hospitalizations and complications were not well supported. It is most valuable for people at high risk of serious flu complications rather than for every healthy adult.

Is Tamiflu safe?

For most people, Tamiflu is considered safe, with common side effects including nausea and vomiting. Reports, mainly from Japan, of abnormal behavior such as delirium and self-harm, especially in children and teens, led regulators to add warnings. However, influenza itself can cause similar neurological symptoms, so the role of the drug versus the illness is not fully clear. Caregivers are advised to monitor young patients.

What was the controversy over Tamiflu’s clinical trials?

For years, independent researchers and the Cochrane review group sought access to the full clinical trial data held by Tamiflu’s manufacturer, arguing that published results were incomplete. After the data were eventually released, their analysis concluded that Tamiflu’s benefits were smaller than originally promoted. The episode became a landmark example in the broader movement for clinical trial data transparency.

Who should take Tamiflu for the flu?

Tamiflu is most beneficial for people at higher risk of flu complications, including older adults, young children, pregnant people, and those with chronic health conditions such as asthma, heart disease, or weakened immunity. For otherwise healthy adults, the modest benefit of shortening symptoms by about a day must be weighed against side effects and cost. A doctor can advise whether antiviral treatment is appropriate.

Is there anything better than Tamiflu for the flu?

Newer antivirals exist, such as baloxavir (Xofluza), which works differently and requires only a single dose, though it has its own cost and potential resistance issues. For most people, the best protection against the flu remains the annual flu vaccine, which reduces the chance of getting sick and the severity of illness. Antivirals are a supplement to, not a replacement for, vaccination.

References

  1. Jefferson T, Jones MA, Doshi P, et al. Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in adults and children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014;(4):CD008965. PMID 24718923
  2. Dobson J, Whitley RJ, Pocock S, Monto AS. Oseltamivir treatment for influenza in adults: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2015;385(9979):1729–1737. PMID 25640810
  3. Hanula R, Bortolussi-Courval É, Mendel A, et al. Evaluation of Oseltamivir Used to Prevent Hospitalization in Outpatients With Influenza: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2024;184(1):18–27. PMID 37306992
  4. CIDRAP. FDA panel: Children’s deaths unrelated to Tamiflu. November 2005. cidrap.umn.edu
  5. NBC News (Associated Press). Japanese officials warn about flu drug use. March 2007. nbcnews.com
  6. Toovey S, Rayner C, Prinssen E, et al. Assessment of neuropsychiatric adverse events in influenza patients treated with oseltamivir: a comprehensive review. Drug Safety. 2008;31(12):1097–1114. PMID 19026027
  7. Nakamura Y, Sugawara T, Ohkusa Y, et al. Abnormal behavior during influenza in Japan during the last seven seasons: 2006–2007 to 2012–2013. Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy. 2014;20(12):789–793. PMID 25284815
  8. Ison MG, Portsmouth S, Yoshida Y, et al. Early treatment with baloxavir marboxil in high-risk adolescent and adult outpatients with uncomplicated influenza (CAPSTONE-2): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2020;20(10):1204–1214. PMID 32526195

Last updated: October 6, 2026